Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 6.5 vs 6.2. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.082 vs $0.139. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 32.20s vs 84.82s, na pass rates 69.7% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaMiMo-V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-25

Kipimo Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Toleo: 2026-02-24 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Toleo: 2026-04-22
Alama 6.2 6.5
Nafasi #125 #111
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.8 7.9
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 69.7% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 1.361 3.124
Jumla ya gharama $0.139 $0.082
Bei ya ingizo $0.065 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.260 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 118,499 105,447
Tokeni za matokeo 12,284 7,120
Tokeni za hoja 490,610 230,682
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 84.82s 32.20s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 515.38s 162.44s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 1781.22s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#125 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
25.8s
Tokeni
4,294 tok

#111 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
54.8s
Tokeni
5,247 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho