Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.2 vs 6.2. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.139 vs $0.249. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) ni ya haraka zaidi: 5.04s vs 84.82s, na pass rates 56.1% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGPT-5.6 Luna (low)It has the best score here (6.2), while responding about 16.8x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Toleo: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.2 6.2
Nafasi #111 #108
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 8.2 7.8
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 56.1% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 5 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 2.490 1.361
Jumla ya gharama $0.249 $0.139
Bei ya ingizo $1.000 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $6.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 96,346 118,499
Tokeni za matokeo 8,211 12,284
Tokeni za hoja 17,227 490,610
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 5.04s 84.82s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 19.44s 515.38s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 110.88s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Gharama
$0.011
Muda
10.2s
Tokeni
1,897 tok

#108 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
25.8s
Tokeni
4,294 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho