Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.139 vs $0.187. Inkling (low) ni ya haraka zaidi: 5.15s vs 84.82s, na pass rates 69.7% vs 54.6%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaInkling (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while responding about 16.5x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-18

Kipimo Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Toleo: 2026-02-24 Inkling Inkling low Toleo: 2026-07-18
Alama 6.2 6.1
Nafasi #110 #119
Uaminifu 10.0 9.9
Uthabiti 7.8 8.6
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 69.7% 54.6%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 4
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 1.361 1.866
Jumla ya gharama $0.139 $0.187
Bei ya ingizo $0.065 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.260 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 118,499 109,884
Tokeni za matokeo 12,284 8,579
Tokeni za hoja 490,610 10,343
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 84.82s 5.15s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 515.38s 41.58s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 1781.22s 113.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
25.8s
Tokeni
4,294 tok

#119 Thinking Machines: Inkling

low
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
6.1s
Tokeni
502 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081
Inkling 5.1 7.2 22.2% 1 8.71s 7,374 355 4,961

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho