Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.5 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.058 vs $0.082. Qwen3.5-27B ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.76s vs 32.20s, na pass rates 40.9% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.5-27BIt has the best score here (6.5), while responding about 6.8x faster than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Toleo: 2026-02-24 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Toleo: 2026-04-22
Alama 6.5 6.5
Nafasi #98 #96
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.3 7.9
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 40.9% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.763 3.124
Jumla ya gharama $0.058 $0.082
Bei ya ingizo $0.195 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.560 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 102,316 105,447
Tokeni za matokeo 24,321 7,120
Tokeni za hoja 0 230,682
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 4.76s 32.20s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 69.46s 162.44s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 104.71s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Gharama
$0.007
Muda
42.9s
Tokeni
4,273 tok

#96 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
54.8s
Tokeni
5,247 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho