Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.3 vs 6.2. LongCat 2.0 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.044 vs $0.139. LongCat 2.0 ni ya haraka zaidi: 5.18s vs 84.82s, na pass rates 36.4% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaLongCat 2.0It has the best score here (6.3), while costing about 3.2x less than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-20

Kipimo LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Toleo: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.3 6.2
Nafasi #111 #114
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.3 7.8
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 36.4% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.627 1.361
Jumla ya gharama $0.044 $0.139
Bei ya ingizo $0.300 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.200 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 108,743 118,499
Tokeni za matokeo 9,372 12,284
Tokeni za hoja 0 490,610
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 5.18s 84.82s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 48.38s 515.38s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 113.95s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Gharama
$0.027
Muda
411.7s
Tokeni
22,283 tok

#114 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
25.8s
Tokeni
4,294 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho