Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.2 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.066 vs $0.139. Seed-2.0-Lite ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.40s vs 84.82s, na pass rates 43.9% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaSeed-2.0-LiteIt has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 2.1x less than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Toleo: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.2 6.2
Nafasi #110 #108
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 8.5 7.8
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 43.9% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 4 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.814 1.361
Jumla ya gharama $0.066 $0.139
Bei ya ingizo $0.250 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 142,197 118,499
Tokeni za matokeo 14,746 12,284
Tokeni za hoja 0 490,610
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 4.40s 84.82s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 44.58s 515.38s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 96.84s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Gharama
$0.005
Muda
83.8s
Tokeni
2,311 tok

#108 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
25.8s
Tokeni
4,294 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho