Ranking de Combinado
Veja quais modelos de IA vão melhor em Combinado, quais permanecem confiáveis e onde aparecem as maiores diferenças. Ordenar por: Métrica ↑.
Motivos de falha
442/442
Filtrar modelos
Nenhum modelo corresponde à pesquisa e aos filtros atuais.
| Posição | Modelo | Empresa | Pontuação de Combinado | Pontuação | Custo total | Testes corretos | Tempo de resposta (médio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #292 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.794 | 0/2 | 262.4s |
| #295 | Mistral Large 4 none | Mistral | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.290 | 0/2 | 36.9s |
| #300 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.690 | 0/2 | 9.26s |
| #301 | Solar Pro 4 none | Upstage | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.022 | 0/2 | 35.1s |
| #305 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL none | NVIDIA | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.040 | 0/2 | 451.9s |
| #307 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.486 | 0/2 | 77.8s |
| #309 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.017 | 0/2 | 61.2s | |
| #311 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.031 | 0/2 | 37.2s | |
| #313 | Seed-2.0-Code none | Bytedance Seed | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.257 | 0/2 | 78.4s |
| #315 | Qwen3.8 27B none | Qwen | 0.3 | 0.5 | ~$0.010 | 0/2 | 24.1s |
| #320 | Ember-1 none | Fireworks | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.786 | 0/2 | 49.0s |
| #323 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 298.2s |
| #326 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.020 | 0/2 | 10.4s |
| #328 | Inkling Small low | Thinkingmachines | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.055 | 0/2 | 4.08s |
| #329 | Ling 3.0 Flash none | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.004 | 0/2 | 8.58s |