AI BENCHY
Comparar Gráficos Metodologia
❤️ Made by XCS
Your ad here

Falhas por categoria AI BENCHY

Específico do domínio
Resposta incorreta

Veja quais modelos de IA têm mais chance de encontrar Resposta incorreta em Específico do domínio, para identificar pontos fracos mais rápido. Ordenar por: Tempo de resposta (médio) ↓.

Modelos exibidos

53

Falhas totais

98

Modelo mais afetado

MiniMax M2.5 2
Posição Modelo Empresa Contagem de Resposta incorreta Pontuação da categoria Testes corretos Tempo de resposta (médio)
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 2 10.0 0/3 237.3s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 204.0s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 174.6s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 2 4.0 1/3 170.5s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 146.5s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 2 10.0 0/3 137.3s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 2 4.0 1/3 127.6s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 1 4.0 1/3 121.8s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 96.0s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 1 10.0 0/3 88.3s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 83.4s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 79.5s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 77.8s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 74.3s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 64.3s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 63.4s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 50.9s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 2 10.0 0/3 44.6s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 1 4.0 1/3 39.3s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 37.3s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 1 7.0 2/3 32.7s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 17.8s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 17.5s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 13.0s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 8.05s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 7.01s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 3 10.0 0/3 6.48s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 2 4.0 1/3 4.38s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 3 10.0 0/3 4.21s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 1 7.0 2/3 3.54s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 2.36s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 3 10.0 0/3 2.24s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 3 10.0 0/3 1.61s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 1.17s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 1.07s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 2 4.0 1/3 1.06s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 1 7.0 2/3 963ms
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 962ms
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 2 4.0 1/3 942ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 905ms
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 2 4.0 1/3 877ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 1 7.0 2/3 744ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 638ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 637ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 564ms
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 540ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 2 4.0 1/3 534ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 2 4.0 1/3 495ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 485ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 465ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 1 4.0 1/3 287ms
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 0ms
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 0ms

Melhores modelos por Contagem de Resposta incorreta

Contagem de Resposta incorreta vs pontuação média

Melhores modelos por Tempo de resposta (médio)

Melhores modelos por Custo desperdiçado estimado