AI BENCHY
Comparar Gráficos Metodologia
❤️ Made by XCS
Your ad here

Falhas por categoria AI BENCHY

Específico do domínio
Resposta incorreta

Veja quais modelos de IA têm mais chance de encontrar Resposta incorreta em Específico do domínio, para identificar pontos fracos mais rápido. Ordenar por: Tempo de resposta (médio) ↑.

Modelos exibidos

53

Falhas totais

98

Modelo mais afetado

Claude Sonnet 4.6 1
Posição Modelo Empresa Contagem de Resposta incorreta Pontuação da categoria Testes corretos Tempo de resposta (médio)
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 0ms
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 0ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 1 4.0 1/3 287ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 465ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 485ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 2 4.0 1/3 495ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 2 4.0 1/3 534ms
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 540ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 564ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 637ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 638ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 1 7.0 2/3 744ms
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 2 4.0 1/3 877ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 905ms
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 2 4.0 1/3 942ms
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 962ms
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 1 7.0 2/3 963ms
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 2 4.0 1/3 1.06s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 1.07s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 1.17s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 3 10.0 0/3 1.61s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 3 10.0 0/3 2.24s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 2.36s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 1 7.0 2/3 3.54s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 3 10.0 0/3 4.21s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 2 4.0 1/3 4.38s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 3 10.0 0/3 6.48s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 7.01s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 8.05s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 13.0s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 17.5s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 17.8s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 1 7.0 2/3 32.7s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 37.3s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 1 4.0 1/3 39.3s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 2 10.0 0/3 44.6s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 50.9s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 63.4s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 64.3s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 74.3s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 77.8s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 79.5s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 83.4s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 1 10.0 0/3 88.3s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 96.0s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 1 4.0 1/3 121.8s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 2 4.0 1/3 127.6s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 2 10.0 0/3 137.3s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 146.5s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 2 4.0 1/3 170.5s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 174.6s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 204.0s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 2 10.0 0/3 237.3s

Melhores modelos por Contagem de Resposta incorreta

Contagem de Resposta incorreta vs pontuação média

Melhores modelos por Tempo de resposta (médio)

Melhores modelos por Custo desperdiçado estimado