Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Responstijd (gem.) ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Xing4.0 29b A4b 0.3
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #407 | Xing4.0 29b A4b medium | Xingchen AGI | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 147.5s |
| #417 | Command A+ medium | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.064 | 0/2 | 92.9s |
| #326 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 0.9 | 0.5 | $1.844 | 1/2 | 88.5s |
| #399 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.4 | $0.106 | 0/2 | 87.3s |
| #423 | Command A+ high | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.079 | 0/2 | 86.2s |
| #427 | Command A+ low | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.073 | 0/2 | 85.4s |
| #372 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.071 | 1/2 | 81.8s |
| #306 | Dots 3 Note Preview medium | Dots Studio | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 78.5s |
| #426 | Command A+ none | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 62.6s |
| #258 | Solar Pro 4 high | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.077 | 2/2 | 62.5s |
| #211 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 2/2 | 62.4s |
| #252 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.716 | 1/2 | 59.3s |
| #202 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.184 | 1/2 | 57.0s |
| #371 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.111 | 0/2 | 56.5s |
| #244 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.841 | 2/2 | 49.8s |