Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↑.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
LongCat 2.0 0.4
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #223 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.121 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #227 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.7 | $1.100 | 1/2 | 2.56s |
| #228 | Minimax M3.1 Flash high | Minimax | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.00s |
| #243 | Minimax M3.1 Flash xhigh | Minimax | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 949ms |
| #248 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.332 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #249 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 12.7s |
| #250 | Dots 3 Note Preview low | Dots Studio | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 11.5s |
| #252 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.716 | 1/2 | 59.3s |
| #253 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.148 | 1/2 | 2.06s |
| #256 | Minimax M3.1 Flash medium | Minimax | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 864ms |
| #264 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.918 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #268 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.669 | 1/2 | 4.70s |
| #273 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 0.7 | 0.6 | $1.752 | 1/2 | 8.10s | |
| #275 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.862 | 1/2 | 16.4s |
| #280 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.029 | 1/2 | 1.43s |