Advertise here
#128

Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen Release: 2026-06-03 Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:52 qwen/qwen3.7-plus::none
~397B total (~17B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.7 Plus scores 7.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #128. It has 10.0 reliability, a 56.5% pass rate, $0.178 total cost, and 17.80s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.7 Plus unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #2, while Coding is its weakest area at #17. It is notably fast compared with similar models.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~397B total (~17B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the nearest released Plus-class architecture.

Parameter source Availability source

Score

7.8

Consistency

10.0

Reliability

10.0

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.178 ↓ -3.0%

Tested at: $0.184

Total Output Tokens

76,261

Total Input Tokens

250,495

Input Price

$0.320 / 1M

Output Price

$1.280 / 1M

Cache Read Price

$0.064 / 1M

Cache Write Price

$0.400 / 1M

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 10

Attempt pass rate: 56.5%

Flaky tests

0

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

17.80s

Response Time (max): 206.03s

Response Time (total): 409.51s

Wrong answer: 9 Did not follow instructions: 1

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#128 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 00:52 Re-test 7.8 10.0 $0.178 ↓ Current run
2026-07-16 21:42 New test added 7.2 10.0 $0.106 ↓ Compare
2026-06-04 13:23 New test added 6.4 10.0 $0.028 Compare
2026-06-03 21:24 Initial run 6.6 10.0 $0.027 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 00:52 · Current run69/69 attempts7.810.010.013/23076,261250,495$0.17817.80s
2026-06-04 13:23 · New test added63/63 attempts6.410.010.010/2106,57842,510$0.0282.85s
Difference—+1.30.00.0+30+69683+207985+$0.151+14954ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price Cache Read Price Cache Write Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $0.400 / 1M $1.600 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-08-14 12:51 $0.320 / 1M $1.280 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-10-01 18:33 $0.320 / 1M $1.280 / 1M $0.064 / 1M $0.400 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Qwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.6mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.7 PlusnonevsStep 3.7 FlashmediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 PlusnonevsMuse WonderhighQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGPT-6 LunahighQwen3.7 PlusnonevsLing 3.1 FlashhighQwen3.7 PlusnonevsMuse Glimmer 30Bhigh

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 10.0 10.0
Anti-AI Tricks 6.5 10.0
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 10.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 5.3 10.0
Instructions following 6.3 10.0
Puzzle Solving 7.7 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models