Navigate
Advertise here

GPT-6 Luna (high) vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. GPT-6 Luna (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.074 vs $0.184. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 17.80s vs 20.37s, with pass rates of 73.9% vs 56.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#111
Total Output Tokens
101,587
Response Time (avg)
20.37s
Total Cost
$0.074
Rank
#108
Total Output Tokens
76,261
Response Time (avg)
17.80s
Total Cost
$0.184
Recommended model GPT-6 Luna (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 2.5x less than Qwen3.7 Plus.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-6 Luna GPT-6 Luna high Release: 2026-09-23 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #111 #108
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 10.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 73.9% 56.5%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.492 1.410
Total Cost $0.074 $0.184
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $0.500 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 229,986 250,495
Output Tokens 6,037 76,261
Reasoning Tokens 95,550 0
Response Time (avg) 20.37s 17.80s
Response Time (max) 106.93s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 468.52s 409.51s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 GPT-6 Luna

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
49.2s
Tokens
5,231 tok

#108 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-6 Luna 7.8 7.4 77.8% 1 24.69s 7,302 483 15,691
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair