#18 Qwen3.7 Plus
medium- Cost
- $0.018
- Time
- 193.2s
- Tokens
- 10,821 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-06-03
Tested on: 2026-06-04 13:27
qwen/qwen3.7-plus::medium
~397B total (~17B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 8.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #18. It has 10.0 reliability, a 77.8% pass rate, $0.221 total cost, and 38.95s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.7 Plus unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~397B total (~17B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the nearest released Plus-class architecture.
8.2
Consistency
9.1
10.0
$0.221
Total Output Tokens
127,879
Total Input Tokens
40,939
Input Price
$0.400 / 1M
Output Price
$1.600 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:49 Re-test | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.277 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:49 New test added | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.267 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:27 New test added | 8.2 | 10.0 | $0.221 | Current run | |
| 2026-06-03 21:33 Initial run | 8.4 | 9.9 | $0.199 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:27 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 8.2 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 15/21 | 2 | 127,879 | 40,939 | $0.221 | 38.95s |
| 2026-06-03 21:33 · Initial run | 60/60 attempts | 8.4 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 15/20 | 2 | 114,586 | 38,104 | $0.199 | 36.84s |
| Difference | — | -0.2 | -0.1 | +0.1 | 0 | 0 | +13293 | +2835 | +$0.023 | +2102ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 14:42 | $0.400 / 1M | $1.600 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.7 PlusmediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsQwen3.6 PlusmediumQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGLM 5.2mediumQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsKimi K3maxQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsClaude Sonnet 4.6medium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.1 | 6.6 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |