Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.224 vs $0.277. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 53.51s, with pass rates of 75.8% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-02

Rank
#65
Total Output Tokens
187,337
Response Time (avg)
53.51s
Total Cost
$0.277
Rank
#68
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.224
Recommended model GLM 5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 2.3x faster than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Release: 2026-06-03 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #65 #68
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 8.9 8.0
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.8% 80.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 2.134 2.159
Total Cost $0.277 $0.224
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 115,242 37,199
Output Tokens 6,163 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 181,174 49,500
Response Time (avg) 53.51s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 315.30s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 1177.25s 488.94s
Parameters ~397B total (~17B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#65 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.018
Time
193.2s
Tokens
10,821 tok

#68 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair