Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 7.9. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.267 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 51.51s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 75.8%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 3.4x faster than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Release: 2026-06-03
Score 9.5 7.9
Rank #2 #36
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 75.8%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 2.072
Total Cost $1.976 $0.267
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 115,233
Output Tokens 8,777 6,162
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 173,267
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 51.51s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 315.30s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 1133.15s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#36 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.018
Time
193.2s
Tokens
10,821 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair