- Rank
- #81
- Total Output Tokens
- 648,854
- Response Time (avg)
- 88.74s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 8.3 vs 8.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.415. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) is faster at 59.73s vs 88.74s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 76.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #82
- Total Output Tokens
- 215,560
- Response Time (avg)
- 59.73s
- Total Cost
- $0.415
Recommended model
Qwen3.7 Plus (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium | Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Rank | #81 | #82 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 76.8% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 2.697 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.415 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.320 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $1.280 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | $0.064 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | $0.400 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 369,495 | 350,546 |
| Output Tokens | 172,852 | 8,576 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 476,002 | 206,984 |
| Response Time (avg) | 88.74s | 59.73s |
| Response Time (max) | 567.88s | 315.30s |
| Response Time (total) | 2041.10s | 1373.73s |
| Parameters | 560B total (25B active) | ~397B total (~17B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#81 Ling 3.1 Flash
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 101.1s
- Tokens
- 11,607 tok
#82 Qwen3.7 Plus
medium- Cost
- $0.018
- Time
- 193.2s
- Tokens
- 10,821 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 100.10s | 233,792 | 12,506 | 12,249 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 196.47s | 235,304 | 2,413 | 25,810 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 750 | 1,152 | 3,396 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 8.58s | 672 | 195 | 5,065 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.15s | 8,298 | 19,577 | 62,002 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 6.1 | 6.6 | 55.6% | 1 | 108.60s | 6,472 | 414 | 43,576 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 306.46s | 106,402 | 26,806 | 100,471 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 8.2 | 6.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 190.27s | 89,228 | 4,403 | 57,645 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.92s | 8,016 | 1,334 | 3,754 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.75s | 7,782 | 270 | 6,713 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 262.25s | 837 | 100,307 | 228,869 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 60.05s | 780 | 58 | 34,980 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 546 | 152 | 1,820 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 25.48s | 516 | 123 | 3,998 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.57s | 744 | 323 | 1,317 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 16.13s | 699 | 102 | 5,013 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 42.32s | 747 | 5,455 | 40,080 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 16.38s | 696 | 280 | 7,312 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 47.17s | 9,135 | 3,850 | 12,018 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.02s | 8,193 | 292 | 1,831 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.55s | 228 | 1,390 | 10,026 | |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 91.07s | 204 | 26 | 15,041 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Qwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxKimi K3maxvsQwen3.7 PlusmediumGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsQwen3.7 PlusmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsQwen3.7 PlusmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGLM 5.2highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsQwen3.7 Plusmedium