Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.9. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.267 vs $0.676. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) is faster at 7.11s vs 51.51s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 75.8%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Terra (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 7.2x faster than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.8 7.9
Rank #39 #36
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 75.8%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.825 2.072
Total Cost $0.676 $0.267
Input Price $2.500 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,175 115,233
Output Tokens 4,878 6,162
Reasoning Tokens 26,952 173,267
Response Time (avg) 7.11s 51.51s
Response Time (max) 41.68s 315.30s
Response Time (total) 156.42s 1133.15s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#39 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Cost
$0.035
Time
16.3s
Tokens
2,418 tok

#36 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.018
Time
193.2s
Tokens
10,821 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair