Navigate
Advertise here

GPT-6 Luna (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.9. GPT-6 Luna (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.031 vs $0.277. GPT-6 Luna (medium) is faster at 15.87s vs 53.51s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 75.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-23

Compared models

Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
45,154
Response Time (avg)
15.87s
Total Cost
$0.031
Rank
#95
Total Output Tokens
187,337
Response Time (avg)
53.51s
Total Cost
$0.277
Recommended model GPT-6 Luna (medium)

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 9.1x less than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-6 Luna GPT-6 Luna medium Release: 2026-09-23 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.9 7.9
Rank #94 #95
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 75.8%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.218 2.134
Total Cost $0.031 $0.277
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $0.500 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,946 115,242
Output Tokens 4,635 6,163
Reasoning Tokens 40,519 181,174
Response Time (avg) 15.87s 53.51s
Response Time (max) 35.14s 315.30s
Response Time (total) 349.09s 1177.25s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#94 GPT-6 Luna

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
23.6s
Tokens
2,966 tok

#95 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.018
Time
193.2s
Tokens
10,821 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-6 Luna 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 23.63s 7,302 438 10,222
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair