Advertise here
#102

Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen Release: 2026-05-22 Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:45 qwen/qwen3.7-max::none
~1T total (~40B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.7 Max scores 7.9 on AI BENCHY and ranks #102. It has 9.9 reliability, a 69.6% pass rate, $0.451 total cost, and 7.85s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.7 Max unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #2, while Coding is its weakest area at #17. It is notably fast compared with similar models.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~1T total (~40B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Vendor does not disclose the count.

Parameter source Availability source

Score

7.9

Consistency

10.0

Reliability

9.9

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.451 ↓ -8.2%

Tested at: $0.492

Total Output Tokens

20,670

Total Input Tokens

243,553

Input Price

$1.475 / 1M

Output Price

$4.425 / 1M

Cache Read Price

$0.295 / 1M

Cache Write Price

$1.844 / 1M

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 7

Attempt pass rate: 69.6%

Flaky tests

0

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

7.85s

Response Time (max): 80.34s

Response Time (total): 180.65s

Wrong answer: 7

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#102 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 00:45 Re-test 7.9 9.9 $0.451 ↓ Current run
2026-07-16 21:33 New test added 7.4 9.9 $0.197 ↓ Compare
2026-06-04 13:21 New test added 7.7 10.0 $0.054 ↓ Compare
2026-05-21 23:54 Initial run 7.9 10.0 $0.101 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 00:45 · Current run69/69 attempts7.910.09.916/23020,670243,553$0.4517.85s
2026-07-16 21:33 · New test added66/66 attempts7.410.09.915/22012,44695,983$0.1974.52s
Difference—+0.50.00.0+10+8224+147570+$0.255+3331ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price Cache Read Price Cache Write Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $1.250 / 1M $3.750 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-08-14 12:51 $1.475 / 1M $4.425 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-10-01 18:33 $1.475 / 1M $4.425 / 1M $0.295 / 1M $1.844 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Qwen3.7 MaxnonevsGPT-5.4 MinimediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsClaude Fable 5.1highQwen3.7 MaxnonevsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxQwen3.7 MaxnonevsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsQwen3.5-27BmediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsLing 3.1 FlashhighQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGPT-5.6 TerralowQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGrok 4.5medium

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 10.0 10.0
Anti-AI Tricks 6.5 10.0
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 6.5 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 7.7 10.0
General Intelligence 10.0 10.0
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 10.0 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models