Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $1.627. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 8.3x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.4 7.4
Rank #58 #59
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.2 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 68.2%
Flaky tests 5 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.324 1.582
Total Cost $1.627 $0.197
Input Price $0.260 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $2.600 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 111,635 95,983
Output Tokens 15,999 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 598,430 0
Response Time (avg) 111.94s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 1026.43s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 2462.67s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#58 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

#59 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair