Advertise here
#149

Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen Release: 2026-02-24 Tested on: 2026-10-01 01:05 qwen/qwen3.5-27b::none
27BDenseOpen source
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.5-27B scores 7.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #149. It has 10.0 reliability, a 47.8% pass rate, $0.116 total cost, and 9.98s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.5-27B unique: It stands out most in Agentic, where it ranks #1, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #17.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Reported
Parameters
27B
Architecture
Dense
Availability
Open source
License
Apache-2.0

Score

7.2

Consistency

9.4

Total Output Tokens

36,422

Total Input Tokens

283,977

Input Price

$0.195 / 1M

Output Price

$1.560 / 1M

Cache Read Price

N/A

Cache Write Price

N/A

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 13

Attempt pass rate: 47.8%

Flaky tests

2

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

9.98s

Response Time (max): 124.53s

Response Time (total): 229.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 01:05 Re-test 7.2 10.0 $0.116 Current run
2026-07-16 22:01 New test added 6.5 10.0 $0.058 ↓ Compare
2026-06-04 13:28 New test added 5.7 10.0 $0.015 ↓ Compare
2026-05-21 23:59 Suite changed 5.8 10.0 $0.017 Compare
2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run 5.9 N/A $0.016 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 01:05 · Current run69/69 attempts7.29.410.010/23236,422283,977$0.1169.98s
2026-06-04 13:28 · New test added63/63 attempts5.79.310.07/2123,59244,478$0.0151.68s
Difference—+1.6+0.10.0+30+32830+239499+$0.102+8301ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 10.0 10.0
Anti-AI Tricks 4.8 10.0
Coding 5.8 10.0
Combined 6.4 5.8
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 5.0 10.0
Instructions following 6.3 10.0
Puzzle Solving 6.7 7.9
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models