Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.6 Plus (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.3. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.116 vs $0.391. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 9.98s vs 57.41s, with pass rates of 47.8% vs 69.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
36,422
Response Time (avg)
9.98s
Total Cost
$0.116
Rank
#137
Total Output Tokens
246,790
Response Time (avg)
57.41s
Total Cost
$0.391
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 3.4x less than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #139 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.4 9.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.8% 69.6%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.153 2.605
Total Cost $0.116 $0.391
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 283,977 222,601
Output Tokens 36,422 8,185
Reasoning Tokens 0 238,605
Response Time (avg) 9.98s 57.41s
Response Time (max) 124.53s 307.08s
Response Time (total) 229.52s 1263.02s
Parameters 27B ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#137 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair