#38 Claude Opus 4.8
low- Cost
- $0.031
- Time
- 14.1s
- Tokens
- 1,345 tok
Anthropic
Release: 2026-05-28
Tested on: 2026-06-30 22:08
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8::low
~5T total (~500B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Claude Opus 4.8 scores 7.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #38. It has 10.0 reliability, a 79.4% pass rate, $1.270 total cost, and 10.83s average response time.
What makes Claude Opus 4.8 unique: It stands out most in Puzzle Solving, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #18. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~5T total (~500B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. External industry estimate; vendor has not disclosed the architecture.
7.7
Consistency
8.8
10.0
$1.270
Total Output Tokens
38,602
Total Input Tokens
60,946
Input Price
$5.000 / 1M
Output Price
$25.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:09 Re-test | 7.8 | 10.0 | $2.089 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:30 New test added | 7.8 | 10.0 | $2.077 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-30 22:08 Initial run | 7.7 | 10.0 | $1.270 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 22:08 · Initial run | 63/63 attempts | 7.7 | 8.8 | 10.0 | 15/21 | 3 | 38,602 | 60,946 | $1.270 | 10.83s |
| 2026-07-16 22:30 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 7.8 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 16/22 | 3 | 51,758 | 156,525 | $2.077 | 12.74s |
| Difference | — | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -1 | 0 | -13156 | -95579 | -$0.807 | -1912ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 22:09 | $5.000 / 1M | $25.000 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Claude Opus 4.8lowvsSeed-2.0-LitemediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsSeed-2.0-CodelowClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsClaude Opus 4.6mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsDeepSeek V4 Prohigh
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.6 | 4.6 | |
| Combined | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |