Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.341 vs $1.270. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) is faster at 10.83s vs 15.74s, with pass rates of 79.4% vs 68.3%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 3.7x less than Claude Opus 4.8 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low Release: 2026-05-28 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #47 #51
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 79.4% 68.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 8.466 2.840
Total Cost $1.270 $0.341
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 60,946 40,101
Output Tokens 31,771 289,325
Reasoning Tokens 6,831 0
Response Time (avg) 10.83s 15.74s
Response Time (max) 127.97s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 227.39s 330.63s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#47 Claude Opus 4.8

low
Cost
$0.031
Time
14.1s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#51 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 7.58s 10,590 3,637 809
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair