Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.073 vs $0.122. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 lebih cepat di 13.56s vs 25.28s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 39.4% vs 43.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.5-FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Rilis: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 6.1 6.1
Peringkat #136 #137
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.3 8.7
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 39.4% 43.9%
Tes tidak stabil 2 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.933 1.636
Total Biaya $0.073 $0.122
Harga input $0.065 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $0.260 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total token input 282,347 94,468
Token output 209,201 51,487
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 25.28s 13.56s
Waktu respons (maks) 480.96s 206.05s
Waktu respons (total) 556.24s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#136 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Biaya
$0.003
Waktu
47.4s
Token
7,799 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
77.0s
Token
4,369 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan