Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.073 vs $0.114. Qwen3.5-Flash lebih cepat di 25.28s vs 54.87s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 56.1% vs 39.4%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.5-FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.6x less than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Rilis: 2025-08-07 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.1 6.1
Peringkat #121 #118
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.0 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 56.1% 39.4%
Tes tidak stabil 8 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.267 0.933
Total Biaya $0.114 $0.073
Harga input $0.050 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Harga output $0.400 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total token input 94,935 282,347
Token output 12,042 209,201
Token penalaran 261,056 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 54.87s 25.28s
Waktu respons (maks) 227.89s 480.96s
Waktu respons (total) 822.99s 556.24s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Biaya
$0.006
Waktu
108.5s
Token
13,209 tok

#118 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Biaya
$0.003
Waktu
47.4s
Token
7,799 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan