Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.4 vs 5.3. Laguna XS 2.1 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $0.059. Laguna XS 2.1 lebih cepat di 1.55s vs 58.43s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 25.8% vs 30.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLaguna XS 2.1Its score stays close to the best score here (5.3 vs 5.4), while costing about 8.2x less than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-22

Metrik Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Rilis: 2026-07-21 Tersedia gratis Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 5.4 5.3
Peringkat #164 #168
Keandalan 9.8 10.0
Konsistensi 8.4 9.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 25.8% 30.3%
Tes tidak stabil 4 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.451 0.143
Total Biaya $0.059 $0.008
Harga input $0.100 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $0.200 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total token input 86,641 91,598
Token output 97,298 13,377
Token penalaran 242,297 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 58.43s 1.55s
Waktu respons (maks) 560.31s 19.02s
Waktu respons (total) 1285.48s 34.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
4.0s
Token
867 tok

#168 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
27.6s
Token
4,344 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan