#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash
high- Biaya
- $0.208
- Waktu
- 118.2s
- Token
- 23,158 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.8 vs 7.7. Step 3.7 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.341 vs $1.115. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) lebih cepat di 8.84s vs 15.74s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 96.8% vs 68.3%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.8), while responding about 1.8x faster than Step 3.7 Flash (low).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.8 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #1 | #51 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 96.8% | 68.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 5.575 | 2.840 |
| Total Biaya | $1.115 | $0.341 |
| Harga input | $1.500 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $9.000 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 37,594 | 40,101 |
| Token output | 1,975 | 289,325 |
| Token penalaran | 115,638 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 8.84s | 15.74s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 34.82s | 124.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 185.57s | 330.63s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#51 Step 3.7 Flash
low
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.004
- Waktu
- 25.3s
- Token
- 3,072 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 22.96s | 8,118 | 456 | 47,129 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 9.46s | 7,437 | 18,685 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.6 LunahighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowMiniMax M3mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok Build 0.1medium