#45 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
medium- Biaya
- $0.013
- Waktu
- 103.4s
- Token
- 3,620 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Kimi K2.6 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.8 vs 7.7. Step 3.7 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.341 vs $0.888. Step 3.7 Flash (low) lebih cepat di 15.74s vs 71.67s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 65.1% vs 68.3%.
Model yang direkomendasikanStep 3.7 Flash (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 2.6x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Tersedia gratis | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #45 | #51 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 65.1% | 68.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 8.358 | 2.840 |
| Total Biaya | $0.888 | $0.341 |
| Harga input | $0.660 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $3.410 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 29,450 | 40,101 |
| Token output | 102,923 | 289,325 |
| Token penalaran | 254,094 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 71.67s | 15.74s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 406.78s | 124.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1433.36s | 330.63s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#51 Step 3.7 Flash
low
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.004
- Waktu
- 25.3s
- Token
- 3,072 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.6 | 5.7 | 8.6 | 33.3% | 0 | 214.42s | 2,925 | 9,970 | 77,189 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 9.46s | 7,437 | 18,685 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.6 LunahighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.8lowvsKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisvsGPT-5.6 TerralowQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisvsGPT-5.6 LunahighKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisvsGrok 4.5lowGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsStep 3.7 Flashlow