#42 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
medium- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 5.2s
- Token
- 1,944 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.8 vs 7.7. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.068 vs $0.341. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) lebih cepat di 3.96s vs 15.74s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 61.9% vs 68.3%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 5.0x less than Step 3.7 Flash (low).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #42 | #51 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 10.0 | 8.4 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 61.9% | 68.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 0 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.523 | 2.840 |
| Total Biaya | $0.068 | $0.341 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.500 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 37,786 | 40,101 |
| Token output | 2,210 | 289,325 |
| Token penalaran | 36,744 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 3.96s | 15.74s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 14.93s | 124.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 83.06s | 330.63s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#51 Step 3.7 Flash
low
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.004
- Waktu
- 25.3s
- Token
- 3,072 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 4.09s | 8,126 | 461 | 8,597 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 9.46s | 7,437 | 18,685 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.6 LunahighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.5lowClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerralowGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 Lunahigh