#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash
high- Biaya
- $0.208
- Waktu
- 118.2s
- Token
- 23,158 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
Ringkasan
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.8 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.246 vs $1.115. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) lebih cepat di 8.84s vs 12.30s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 96.8% vs 63.5%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.8 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #1 | #53 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 96.8% | 63.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 5 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 5.575 | 2.228 |
| Total Biaya | $1.115 | $0.246 |
| Harga input | $1.500 / 1M | $0.740 / 1M |
| Harga output | $9.000 / 1M | $2.960 / 1M |
| Total token input | 37,594 | 42,750 |
| Token output | 1,975 | 2,509 |
| Token penalaran | 115,638 | 69,594 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 8.84s | 12.30s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 34.82s | 95.65s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 185.57s | 258.34s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
high- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 26.4s
- Token
- 3,117 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 22.96s | 8,118 | 456 | 47,129 | |
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 22.00s | 7,893 | 422 | 20,461 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsMiniMax M3mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGrok Build 0.1mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 Lunamedium