#50 Claude Opus 4.6
medium
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
Ringkasan
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.7 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.246 vs $2.053. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) lebih cepat di 12.30s vs 25.89s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 61.9% vs 63.5%.
Model yang direkomendasikanKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 8.4x less than Claude Opus 4.6 (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #50 | #53 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 61.9% | 63.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 5 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 17.103 | 2.228 |
| Total Biaya | $2.053 | $0.246 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.740 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $2.960 / 1M |
| Total token input | 53,227 | 42,750 |
| Token output | 47,446 | 2,509 |
| Token penalaran | 24,000 | 69,594 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 25.89s | 12.30s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 83.40s | 95.65s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 362.49s | 258.34s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
high- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 26.4s
- Token
- 3,117 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.6 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 44.4% | 1 | 30.10s | 8,522 | 13,057 | 4,121 | |
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 22.00s | 7,893 | 422 | 20,461 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.6mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsGPT-5.6 LunahighClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsGPT-5.6 TerralowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsMiniMax M3mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGrok Build 0.1mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Prohigh