- Peringkat
- #167
- Total token output
- 11,118
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 1.85s
- Total Biaya
- $0.047
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) vs Gemma 4 31B (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.1 vs 6.2. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.047 vs $0.101. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) lebih cepat di 1.85s vs 78.59s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 51.5% vs 65.2%.
- Peringkat
- #164
- Total token output
- 267,421
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 78.59s
- Total Biaya
- $0.101
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)
It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 2.2x less than Gemma 4 31B (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Tersedia gratis |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Peringkat | #167 | #164 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 51.5% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.465 | 1.152 |
| Total Biaya | $0.047 | $0.101 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.100 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.500 / 1M | $0.340 / 1M |
| Total token input | 119,076 | 94,969 |
| Token output | 11,118 | 34,399 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 233,022 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 1.85s | 78.59s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 12.97s | 437.40s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 40.74s | 1571.84s |
| Parameter | ~150B total (~10B aktif) | 30.7B |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#167 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
minimal- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 3.7s
- Token
- 635 tok
#164 Gemma 4 31B
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 45.7s
- Token
- 2,696 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 1.10s | 500 | 639 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.89s | 816 | 962 | 2,046 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 831ms | 8,126 | 666 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 4.3 | 5.8 | 22.2% | 1 | 219.76s | 5,568 | 11,098 | 33,212 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.75s | 94,962 | 8,988 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 433.11s | 77,035 | 12,112 | 157,552 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.04s | 7,552 | 279 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.11s | 8,334 | 1,822 | 2,951 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 972ms | 652 | 15 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 59.92s | 853 | 4,280 | 18,729 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 791ms | 490 | 63 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.57s | 567 | 105 | 888 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 932ms | 615 | 72 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.76s | 777 | 533 | 2,035 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2.15s | 564 | 153 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 26.91s | 801 | 1,795 | 5,595 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.51s | 5,457 | 234 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 724ms | 158 | 9 | 0 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 90.14s | 218 | 1,692 | 10,014 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-LitenonevsGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisvsGPT-5.6 LunalowClaude Sonnet 5nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumClaude Sonnet 5nonevsGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisGemini 3.1 Flash Liteminimalvsgpt-oss-120bmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsInklinglowSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash Liteminimal