- Peringkat
- #205
- Total token output
- 1,890
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 6.19s
- Total Biaya
- $0.017
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.1 vs 6.0. Gemini 2.5 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.017 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash lebih cepat di 3.73s vs 6.19s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 39.4% vs 34.9%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #200
- Total token output
- 30,947
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 3.73s
- Total Biaya
- $0.062
Model yang direkomendasikan
Qwen3.6 Flash
It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 1.7x faster than Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none | Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.0 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #205 | #200 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 39.4% | 34.9% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 1 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.209 | 0.935 |
| Total Biaya | $0.017 | $0.062 |
| Harga input | $0.300 / 1M | $0.188 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.500 / 1M | $1.125 / 1M |
| Total token input | 39,886 | 139,797 |
| Token output | 1,890 | 30,947 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 6.19s | 3.73s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 118.00s | 48.79s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 136.23s | 81.95s |
| Parameter | ~350B total (~20B aktif) | ~35B total (~3B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#205 Gemini 2.5 Flash
none
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.164
- Waktu
- 215.5s
- Token
- 65,659 tok
#200 Qwen3.6 Flash
none- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 20.1s
- Token
- 4,211 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 582ms | 492 | 102 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.63s | 696 | 1,554 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 736ms | 8,122 | 483 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 5.4 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.79s | 6,488 | 889 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 61.19s | 16,470 | 486 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 26.50s | 113,653 | 27,098 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 652ms | 7,257 | 279 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.13s | 7,794 | 243 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 449ms | 642 | 12 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 963ms | 798 | 15 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 615ms | 486 | 78 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 947ms | 522 | 132 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 590ms | 615 | 72 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.10s | 711 | 66 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 604ms | 558 | 132 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.21s | 714 | 669 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.91s | 5,088 | 234 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.49s | 8,211 | 272 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.15s | 156 | 12 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 649ms | 210 | 9 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Trinity Large ThinkingmediumvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGemini 2.5 FlashnoneQwen3.6 FlashnonevsInklinglowgpt-oss-120bmediumvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGPT-5 NanomediumGPT-5.6 LunalowvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsGemini 2.5 FlashnoneGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsInklinglowGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsQwen3.5-Flashmedium