Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.5 vs 6.2. Gemini 2.5 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.017 vs $0.068. Gemini 2.5 Flash lebih cepat di 6.20s vs 47.93s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 43.9% vs 42.4%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 2.5 FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.5), while costing about 4.0x less than Laguna XS 2.1 (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Rilis: 2025-06-17 Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 medium Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 6.2 6.5
Peringkat #112 #97
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.6 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 43.9% 42.4%
Tes tidak stabil 1 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.186 0.746
Total Biaya $0.017 $0.068
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $2.500 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total token input 39,877 118,989
Token output 1,890 30,750
Token penalaran 0 491,833
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 6.20s 47.93s
Waktu respons (maks) 118.00s 422.72s
Waktu respons (total) 136.37s 1054.49s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#112 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
SVG tidak valid
Biaya
$0.164
Waktu
215.5s
Token
65,659 tok

#97 Laguna XS 2.1

medium
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
30.6s
Token
4,678 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Laguna XS 2.1 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 70.35s 7,995 23,767 83,258

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan