Navigasi
Advertise here

Model yang Dibandingkan

Perbandingan benchmark Claude Opus 5 (high) vs Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) vs Claude Opus 5 (low) vs Claude Opus 5: Claude Opus 5 (high) unggul pada Skor dengan 9.2. Claude Opus 5 (high) unggul pada Keandalan dengan 10.0. Claude Opus 5 (low) memiliki Total Biaya terendah di $1.121. Claude Opus 5 (low) paling cepat di 6.99s.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-10

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#20
Total token output
95,583
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
22.51s
Total Biaya
$3.070
Peringkat
#94
Total token output
96,722
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
32.23s
Total Biaya
$2.961
Peringkat
#40
Total token output
17,992
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
6.99s
Total Biaya
$1.121
Peringkat
#101
Total token output
24,866
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
7.65s
Total Biaya
$1.550
Model yang direkomendasikan Claude Opus 5 (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 9.2), while costing about 2.3x less than model lain dalam perbandingan ini.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 high Rilis: 2026-07-25 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Rilis: 2026-02-05 Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 low Rilis: 2026-07-25 Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 none Rilis: 2026-07-25
Skor 9.2 7.7 8.7 7.5
Peringkat #20 #94 #40 #101
Keandalan 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 10.0 8.8 9.6 9.6
Percobaan 66/66 66/66 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 81.8% 63.6% 83.3% 57.6%
Tes tidak stabil 0 3 1 1
Total Run 66 66 66 66
Biaya per hasil 17.052 22.777 6.223 12.912
Total Biaya $3.070 $2.961 $1.121 $1.550
Harga input $5.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Harga output $25.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M
Total token input 135,956 108,573 134,770 185,547
Token output 64,624 69,994 13,604 24,866
Token penalaran 30,959 26,728 4,388 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 22.51s 32.23s 6.99s 7.65s
Waktu respons (maks) 159.01s 151.51s 30.67s 47.72s
Waktu respons (total) 495.12s 515.65s 153.80s 168.35s
Parameter ~5T total (~500B aktif) ~5T total (~500B aktif) ~5T total (~500B aktif) ~5T total (~500B aktif)
Ketersediaan Tertutup Tertutup Tertutup Tertutup

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#20 Claude Opus 5

high
Biaya
$0.265
Waktu
144.5s
Token
10,741 tok

#94 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
300.0s
Token
0 tok

#40 Claude Opus 5

low
Biaya
$0.062
Waktu
30.2s
Token
2,615 tok

#101 Claude Opus 5

none
Biaya
$0.271
Waktu
149.3s
Token
10,962 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Opus 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.73s 10,590 7,547 1,721
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
Claude Opus 5 7.8 7.4 77.8% 1 6.70s 10,590 2,442 760
Claude Opus 5 5.9 9.7 33.3% 0 5.54s 10,590 2,886 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Claude Opus 5nonevsNemotron 3 UltramediumTersedia gratisClaude Opus 5nonevsSolar Pro 4xhighClaude Opus 5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 5lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowClaude Opus 5nonevsGPT-5.6 LunahighClaude Opus 5nonevsGPT-5.4 NanomediumClaude Opus 5lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.3mediumClaude Opus 5highvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsDeepSeek V4 ProhighClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 Flashhigh