Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.9 vs 8.6. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.433 vs $3.478. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) lebih cepat di 5.55s vs 17.20s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 78.8% vs 87.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (low)It has the best score here (8.9), while costing about 8.0x less than Claude Fable 5 (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Rilis: 2026-06-10 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low Rilis: 2026-05-19
Skor 8.6 8.9
Peringkat #22 #16
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.6 9.7
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 78.8% 87.9%
Tes tidak stabil 1 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 20.459 2.277
Total Biaya $3.478 $0.433
Harga input $10.000 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Harga output $50.000 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total token input 89,643 87,817
Token output 41,360 2,239
Token penalaran 10,269 31,182
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 17.20s 5.55s
Waktu respons (maks) 80.80s 53.55s
Waktu respons (total) 378.41s 122.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Fable 5

medium
Biaya
$0.606
Waktu
156.7s
Token
12,264 tok

#16 Gemini 3.5 Flash

low
Biaya
$0.068
Waktu
39.1s
Token
7,588 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 6.71s 8,118 458 13,420

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan