Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs xAI: Grok 4.5

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.9 vs 8.9. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.433 vs $1.707. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) lebih cepat di 5.55s vs 76.50s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 87.9% vs 83.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (low)It has the best score here (8.9), while costing about 3.9x less than Grok 4.5 (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low Rilis: 2026-05-19 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 high Rilis: 2026-07-08
Skor 8.9 8.9
Peringkat #11 #12
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.7 9.2
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 87.9% 83.3%
Tes tidak stabil 1 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 2.277 10.041
Total Biaya $0.433 $1.707
Harga input $1.500 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Harga output $9.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total token input 87,817 151,562
Token output 2,239 5,655
Token penalaran 31,182 247,540
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 5.55s 76.50s
Waktu respons (maks) 53.55s 676.83s
Waktu respons (total) 122.19s 1683.07s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#11 Gemini 3.5 Flash

low
Biaya
$0.068
Waktu
39.1s
Token
7,588 tok

#12 xAI: Grok 4.5

high
Biaya
$0.015
Waktu
29.7s
Token
2,737 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 6.71s 8,118 458 13,420
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 155.16s 9,579 357 100,752

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan