Catégorie AI BENCHY
Classement Combiné
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Combiné, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Tests corrects ↑.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Combiné | Score | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #89 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 4.9 | 0/1 | 7.58s |
| #90 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 3.0 | 4.8 | 0/1 | 5.91s |
| #91 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 3.0 | 4.8 | 0/1 | 606ms |
| #92 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 3.0 | 4.7 | 0/1 | 4.28s |
| #93 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 2.8 | 4.6 | 0/1 | 65.6s |
| #94 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 3.0 | 4.5 | 0/1 | 2.87s |
| #95 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 3.0 | 4.5 | 0/1 | 3.33s |
| #96 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 4.5 | 0/1 | 3.84s |
| #97 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 3.0 | 4.4 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #98 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 3.0 | 4.1 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 10.0 | 1/1 | 50.2s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 9.5 | 9.6 | 1/1 | 40.6s | |
| #3 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | 1/1 | 21.4s |
| #4 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 9.5 | 9.2 | 1/1 | 18.3s |
| #6 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.6 | 1/1 | 37.7s |