Classement Programmation
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Programmation, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Temps de réponse (moy.) ↑.
289/289
Filtrer les modèles
Aucun modèle ne correspond à la recherche et aux filtres actuels.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Programmation | Score | Coût total | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #59 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 8.8 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 2/3 | 9.82s |
| #64 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite medium | 7.9 | 7.8 | $0.272 | 2/3 | 9.96s | |
| #38 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 8.4 | 8.4 | $0.655 | 2/3 | 10.1s |
| #45 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.673 | 3/3 | 10.3s |
| #93 | GPT-5.6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 5.4 | 7.4 | $0.072 | 1/3 | 10.4s |
| #148 | Inkling Small medium | Thinkingmachines | 7.8 | 6.6 | $0.113 | 2/3 | 10.5s |
| #85 | GPT 5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 5.6 | 7.5 | $0.533 | 1/3 | 10.5s |
| #229 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 3.8 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 0/3 | 10.6s |
| #164 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 6.0 | 6.3 | $0.043 | 1/3 | 10.7s |
| #220 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 3.5 | 5.4 | $0.046 | 0/3 | 11.1s |
| #178 | Gemma 4 31B none | 5.5 | 6.1 | $0.016 | 1/3 | 11.2s | |
| #247 | Ling-2.6-flash none | Inclusionai | 5.3 | 4.9 | $0.002 | 1/3 | 11.2s |
| #4 | GPT-5.6 Sol low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.5 | $0.496 | 3/3 | 11.3s |
| #9 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.629 | 3/3 | 12.5s |
| #18 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 7.9 | 9.0 | $0.665 | 2/3 | 12.6s |