Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Inkling leads on average score with 5.2 vs 4.7. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.032 vs $0.147. Inkling is faster at 3.50s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 28.8%.

Recommended modelInklingIt has the best score here (5.2), while responding about 2.7x faster than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03 Inkling Inkling none Release: 2026-07-18
Score 4.7 5.2
Rank #183 #160
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.0 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 28.8%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.793 2.448
Total Cost $0.032 $0.147
Input Price $0.110 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 148,194 104,111
Output Tokens 19,069 10,551
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 9.61s 3.50s
Response Time (max) 81.80s 48.02s
Response Time (total) 153.69s 77.09s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#183 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#160 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
5.3s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair