Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) vs Step 3.7 Flash (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.3 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.454. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 20.68s vs 36.80s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Rank
#77
Total Output Tokens
376,581
Response Time (avg)
20.68s
Total Cost
$0.454
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 11.0x less than Step 3.7 Flash (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.3 7.3
Rank #75 #77
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.4 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 5 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.346 3.782
Total Cost $0.042 $0.454
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 92,182 103,833
Output Tokens 14,287 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 282,962 0
Response Time (avg) 36.80s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 394.54s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 809.54s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#77 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair