Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) vs Step 3.7 Flash (low)

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 7.3. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.454 vs $1.143. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 20.68s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#25
Total Output Tokens
169,940
Response Time (avg)
67.53s
Total Cost
$1.143
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
376,581
Response Time (avg)
20.68s
Total Cost
$0.454
Recommended model Step 3.7 Flash (low)

It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (7.3), lower cost than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium), and balanced response time.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 8.4 7.3
Rank #25 #75
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.173 3.782
Total Cost $1.143 $0.454
Input Price $1.040 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $6.240 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,240 103,833
Output Tokens 5,098 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 164,842 0
Response Time (avg) 67.53s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 238.07s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 1485.64s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

#75 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair