Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.073 vs $0.122. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is faster at 13.56s vs 25.28s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #136 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 43.9%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.933 1.636
Total Cost $0.073 $0.122
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 282,347 94,468
Output Tokens 209,201 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 25.28s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 480.96s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 556.24s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#136 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair