Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-9B vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3.5-9B leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.027 vs $0.041. GLM 4.7 Flash is faster at 13.04s vs 37.19s, with pass rates of 18.8% vs 29.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#317
Total Output Tokens
70,427
Response Time (avg)
37.19s
Total Cost
$0.041
Rank
#321
Total Output Tokens
27,395
Response Time (avg)
13.04s
Total Cost
$0.027
Recommended model GLM 4.7 Flash

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 4.9), while costing about 1.5x less than Qwen3.5-9B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.9 4.8
Rank #317 #321
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.8% 29.0%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.022 0.528
Total Cost $0.041 $0.027
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.061 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 307,670 255,363
Output Tokens 70,427 27,395
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 37.19s 13.04s
Response Time (max) 433.02s 97.15s
Response Time (total) 855.27s 221.61s
Parameters 9B 30B total (3B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#317 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#321 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Laguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9BnoneNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowvsQwen3.5-9BnoneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsQwen3.5-9BnoneGranite 4.2 8BhighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9BnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsQwen3.5-9BnoneKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneLaguna S 2.1mediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9BnoneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsGLM 4.7 Flashnone