Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Flash

Summary

Qwen3.5-9B vs MiMo-V2-Flash benchmark comparison: MiMo-V2-Flash leads on average score with 4.6 vs 4.2. MiMo-V2-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.036. MiMo-V2-Flash is faster at 2.76s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 27.0% vs 25.4%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2-Flash - It has the best score here (4.6), while responding about 29.8x faster than Qwen3.5-9B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02 MiMo-V2-Flash MiMo-V2-Flash none Release: 2025-12-16
Score 4.2 4.6
Rank #162 #153
Reliability 6.7 6.7
Consistency 8.0 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.0% 25.4%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.187 0.584
Total Cost $0.036 $0.025
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 17,070 36,851
Output Tokens 29,045 68,882
Reasoning Tokens 209,516 0
Response Time (avg) 82.24s 2.76s
Response Time (max) 226.38s 19.68s
Response Time (total) 1315.88s 46.99s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#162 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

#153 MiMo-V2-Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.7s
Tokens
1,481 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 5.1 5.8 50.0% 2 34.44s 369 2,621 12,411
MiMo-V2-Flash 3.2 8.0 8.3% 1 1.19s 645 865 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129
MiMo-V2-Flash 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.64s 7,442 763 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.87s 15,075 330 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.6 5.6 33.3% 1 87.31s 4,722 1,383 32,113
MiMo-V2-Flash 2.9 5.8 16.7% 1 19.68s 2,622 161 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 137.75s 295 11,549 48,475
MiMo-V2-Flash 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 564ms 753 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 226.38s 180 0 30,695
MiMo-V2-Flash 4.6 10.0 0.0% 0 1.67s 498 104 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 5.75s 381 491 1,824
MiMo-V2-Flash 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 857ms 684 69 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 32.27s 376 1,593 12,026
MiMo-V2-Flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 1.86s 678 66,282 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.31s 8,283 444 1,149
MiMo-V2-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.28s 8,238 272 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 177.02s 68 3,074 29,694
MiMo-V2-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.82s 216 12 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair