Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.837. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 13.7x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #130 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 34.9%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.130 0.935
Total Cost $0.837 $0.062
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 130,388 139,788
Output Tokens 40,630 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 786,040 0
Response Time (avg) 112.47s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 950.25s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 2474.28s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#130 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair