Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.090 vs $0.231. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 7.82s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-27BIts score stays close to the best score here (6.5 vs 6.6), while costing about 2.6x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #100 #95
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.3 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 60.6%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.763 2.061
Total Cost $0.090 $0.231
Input Price $0.260 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $2.600 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 102,316 106,339
Output Tokens 24,321 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.76s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 69.46s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 104.71s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#95 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair