Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.6 27B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.680. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 59.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#113
Total Output Tokens
24,321
Response Time (avg)
4.76s
Total Cost
$0.058
Rank
#109
Total Output Tokens
274,192
Response Time (avg)
106.32s
Total Cost
$0.680
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 11.7x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #113 #109
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 59.1%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.763 7.319
Total Cost $0.058 $0.680
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 102,316 106,167
Output Tokens 24,321 32,889
Reasoning Tokens 0 241,303
Response Time (avg) 4.76s 106.32s
Response Time (max) 69.46s 1085.11s
Response Time (total) 104.71s 2339.12s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#113 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#109 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair